23
1
i
their views to you, but I did not fully concur in them. Mr Brewin was the senior officer who had any aptitude for the post. He was an officer of great merit and ability who would very keenly feel being passed over by a man of half his service, and his excellent work entitled him to recognition. If his physique was equal to the work (which I doubted) he had strong clains. They had, I understood, opposed his appointment on the ground that he was too "pro- Chinese", as Registrar General I pointed out that
it was officially his duty to take the Chinese point
of view, but I believed him to be a man who if he
held a more responsible panitian and larger office
would take correspondingly large views, and in this
opinion Sir Henry May who had know him for 20 years
concurred. As regards Mr Clementi I endorsed all
they had said. He combined great ability with exception-
al industry and rapidity, and had as Assistant Colonial
Secretary a long training in and knowledge of the
Secretariat work. As regards Mr Sercombe Smith I
informed them that the Chinese Members of Council
had told me that if he were appointed they would find
it necessary to resign their seats on the Council as
they had found him an impossible man to work with.
I might personally prevail upon them not to take this
step, but if they insisted it would be most difficult
to replace them, and what they had said was an indica-
tion of the depth of feeling against the appointment
which was held by the Chinese. Sir Paul Chater had
at first associated himself with them in recommending
Mr Brewin.
3
After very careful consideration
I had decided to recommend the appointment of Mr
Brewin
b
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.